Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Coming to grips with losing a warPat Lang observes in a post of 11/12/06:People in the Washington/New York establishment act and talk as though the Iraq problem is an American political problem and that the Iraqis and other Muslims are acted upon rather than being actors in the drama.He's referring in particular to the Maliki government in Baghdad. But it could also be a reminder that the enemy also has a say in the outcome of the war. It would not be a good thing if the discussion of a new policy in Iraq makes the assumption that only what the United States decides matters. Lang has low expectations of Baker's secret-plan-to-end-the-war Iraq Study Group's famous forthcoming report: Unless some catastrophe intervenes, two years from now we will still be fighting in Iraq with much the same number of forces, and by then decline will have set in at home and abroad in ways that can only be hinted at now.William Lind's political speculations are not something I find especially useful. But when you look at things like the kidnapping of 100-150 people from an Education Ministry building in broad daylight in Baghdad, it's hard to disregard what he saying about the war in Lose a War, Lose an Election Antiwar.com 11/14/06. Noting that "there are no good options" now, he writes: [I]f we withdraw, the civil war will intensify all the more rapidly. Unless that civil war is won by someone, someone who can re-create an Iraqi state, Iraq will become a stateless region of permanent chaos, a generator and supplier of the non-state Islamic forces who are our real enemy. That may also happen if the wrong elements win the civil war, extremist Shi'ites allied with Iran or extremist Sunnis with strong al-Qaeda sympathies. The factions who might create a government we could live with are either Ba'athist or connected with the current Iraqi government, neither of which is likely to come out on top. Eggs, once broken, are hard to unscramble. ...The Baker-Hamilton group is likely only to come up with what is a cover for keeping the war going another two years without a complete collapse of the situation (although collapse wouldn't be such a bad description of what seems to be going on now) so that Bush can pass on his disaster to the next President instead of taking the responsibility to extricate the US from the mess he created. | +Save/Share | | |
FEATURED QUOTE
No subject for immortal verse That we who lived by honest dreams Defend the bad against the worse." -- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?
ABOUT US
RECENT POSTS
ARCHIVES
RECENT COMMENTS
[Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
SEARCH THIS SITE
BLUE'S NEWS
ACT BLUE
BLUE LINKS
Environmental Links Gay/Lesbian Links News & Media Links Organization Links Political Links Religious Links Watchdog Links
BLUE ROLL
MISCELLANEOUS
|