Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Nobody Likes Bush's War, But Now What?

As Bruce pointed out below, an increasing number of Republicans are abandoning Bush's beloved Iraq war.

It's about time they started catching up with the rest of the sane world, although I wonder how many realize now that it's a war that should never have happened or whether they've jumped ship only because things are such a catastrofrak over there. Still it's a hopeful development.

Perhaps the continuing turn of the tide will convince Democrats not to be such wimps and the Republicans like Richard Lugar to actually do something rather than just posturing about it which, in answer to Bruce's question is all he's willing to do at this point:

Lugar's spokesman Andy Fisher said the senator wanted to express his concerns publicly before Bush reviews his Iraq strategy in September.

"They've known his position on this for quite a while," Fisher said of the White House.

However, Fisher said the speech does not mean Lugar would switch his vote on the war or embrace Democratic measures setting a deadline for troop withdrawals.
Matthew Yglesias, however, isn't holding his breath:

Democrats had a bill that passed congress that would have substantially rolled back the war. Bush vetoed it. The GOP helped Bush sustain that veto. When Republicans want to revisit that legislation and vote to override Bush's veto, then they'll be breaking with Bush on Iraq. Until then, both the ones talking a good game and the ones talking bad one are, in fact, backing the president.
Harry Reid on the other hand, raised the stakes:

Reid yesterday hailed Lugar's speech as a "potential turning point" in the debate, adding that he looks forward to Lugar putting "his words into action by delivering the responsible end to the war that the American people demand."
Unlike Taylor Marsh who thinks this statement is a sign of the Democrats' growing desperation, I think it's a calculated move to put pressure on Lugar et al to back their rhetoric with their votes.

The key here is to set the demarcation line between those who support the war and those who don't, and weld those who do with Bush and his increasingly unpopular war. This of course, would only work if Democrats finally put some teeth to the appropriations bill come September by setting a timeline for withdrawal.

Failure to do this would only blur the distinction between the parties in the electorate's minds and give the Republicans a leg to stand on in '08.


| +Save/Share | |




FEATURED QUOTE

"It is the logic of our times
No subject for immortal verse
That we who lived by honest dreams
Defend the bad against the worse."


-- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?


ABOUT US

  • What is the Blue Voice?
  • Bruce Miller
  • Fdtate
  • Marcia Ellen (on hiatus)
  • Marigolds2
  • Neil
  • Tankwoman
  • Wonky Muse

  • RECENT POSTS

  • Dick Lugar's "antiwar" speech
  • Cheney
  • (Some of) Our Mayors Rock!
  • Update on The Surge in Iraq
  • Little Plastic Bottles Everywhere
  • Brief Cogitation
  • The Comedy of Errors Continues
  • Robert Fisk on the idea of Tony Blair as special e...
  • Soldiers and strategy
  • When hippies trash the military

  • ARCHIVES




    RECENT COMMENTS

    [Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
    SEARCH THIS SITE
    Google
    www TBV

    BLUE'S NEWS





    ACT BLUE











    BLUE LINKS

    Environmental Links
    Gay/Lesbian Links
    News & Media Links
    Organization Links
    Political Links
    Religious Links
    Watchdog Links

    BLUE ROLL


    MISCELLANEOUS

    Atom/XML Feed
    Blogarama - Blog Directory
    Blogwise - blog directory

    Blogstreet
    Haloscan


    Blogger

    hits since 06-13-2005

    site design: wonky muse
    image: fpsoftlab.com