Tuesday, May 12, 2009

How much of a PTSD problem is there?


I just saw a brief segment on CNN dealing with the shooting of five service members by another in a clinic in Iraq. (See Sgt. charged with killing 4 soldiers, 1 sailor by Michelle Tan Army Times 05/12/09.)

One of the talking heads on the CNN segment was saying that one third of soldiers returning from Iraq are diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Now, I think it's a real scandal that the Army seems to be reluctant to recognize the extent of this problem. Getting the right treatment for soldiers suffering from combat-related disorders is important for all kinds of reasons, one of which this mass murder case dramatizes.

David Dobbs in the April 2009 Scientific American, Soldiers' Stress: What Doctors Get Wrong about PTSD, argues - apart from the issues about access to proper treatment - that some of the estimates of the incidence of PTSD are seriously exaggerated. The articles three summary bullet-points:

  • The syndrome of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is under fire because its defining criteria are too broad, leading to rampant overdiagnosis.
  • The flawed PTSD concept may mistake soldiers' natural process of adjustment to civilian life for dysfunction.
  • Misdiagnosed soldiers receive the wrong treatments and risk becoming mired in a Veterans Administration system that encourages chronic disability.
Dobbs summarizes the studies on PTSD as follows:

The biggest longitudinal study of soldiers returning from Iraq, led by VA researcher Charles Milliken and published in 2007, seemed to confirm that we should expect a high incidence of PTSD. It surveyed combat troops immediately on return from deployment and again about six months later and found around 20 percent symptomatically "at risk" of PTSD. But of those reporting symptoms in the first survey, half had improved by the second survey, and many who first claimed few or no symptoms later reported serious symptoms. How many of the early "symptoms" were just normal adjustment? How many of the later symptoms were the imposition of a trauma narrative onto other problems?

[Major Matt] Stevens [who served in Iraq as a medic and experiences combat-related dreams], for one, is certain these screens are mistaking many going through normal adjustment as dangerously at risk of PTSD. Even he, though functioning fine at work and home and in society, scored positive in both surveys; he is, in other words, one of the 20 percent at risk. Finally, and weirdly, both screens missed about 75 percent of those who actually sought counseling a finding that raises further doubts about the evaluations' accuracy. Yet this study received prominent media coverage emphasizing that PTSD rates were probably being badly undercounted.

A few months later another study the first to track large numbers of soldiers through the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan provided a clearer and more consistent picture. Led by U.S. Navy researcher Tyler Smith and published in the British Medical Journal, the study monitored mental health and combat exposure in 50,000 U.S. soldiers from 2001 to 2006. The researchers took particular care to tie symptoms to types of combat exposure. Among some 12,000 troops who went to Iraq or Afghanistan, 4.3 percent developed diagnosis-level symptoms of PTSD. The rate ran about 8 percent in those with combat exposure and 2 percent in those not exposed.

These numbers are about a quarter of the rates Milliken found. But they are a close match to PTSD rates seen in British Iraq War vets and to rates [Richard] McNally [of the Harvard Department of Psychology] calculated for Vietnam veterans. The contrast to the Milliken study, along with the consistency with British rates and with McNally's NVVRS calculation, should have made the Smith study big news. Yet the media, the VA and the trauma psychology community almost completely ignored the study. "The silence," McNally wryly noted, "was deafening." [my emphasis]
Even the Millikin study, which Dobbs argues that the other data suggest is exaggerated in its 20% estimate, doesn't justify the "one third" number the CNN talking head was using this morning.

See also: Richard McNally, Progress and Controversy in the Study of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Annual Review of Psychology 2003 (article first published 08/06/02). Dobbs calls McNally "perhaps the most forceful of the critics" of the prevalence of the PTSD diagnosis.

Tags: , ,

| +Save/Share | |

Links to this post:

Create a Link




FEATURED QUOTE

"It is the logic of our times
No subject for immortal verse
That we who lived by honest dreams
Defend the bad against the worse."


-- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?


ABOUT US

  • What is the Blue Voice?
  • Bruce Miller
  • Fdtate
  • Marcia Ellen (on hiatus)
  • Marigolds2
  • Neil
  • Tankwoman
  • Wonky Muse

  • RECENT POSTS

  • Long War, dead-or-alive
  • Tom Hayden on the Weather Underground's "revolutio...
  • MoDo's psychedelic version of reality
  • Pakistan: still collapsing after all these years?
  • The sorrows of the Republican Party
  • A tale of three columns
  • Obama and the Vatican
  • Ron Paul and the Republicans
  • What George McGovern says
  • AfPak War

  • ARCHIVES




    RECENT COMMENTS

    [Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
    SEARCH THIS SITE
    Google
    www TBV

    BLUE'S NEWS





    ACT BLUE











    BLUE LINKS

    Environmental Links
    Gay/Lesbian Links
    News & Media Links
    Organization Links
    Political Links
    Religious Links
    Watchdog Links

    BLUE ROLL


    MISCELLANEOUS

    Atom/XML Feed
    Blogarama - Blog Directory
    Blogwise - blog directory

    Blogstreet
    Haloscan


    Blogger

    hits since 06-13-2005

    site design: wonky muse
    image: fpsoftlab.com