Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Christian Rightists jumped to defend conservatives over the Tucson shootingTony Beam wrote on the January 8 Tuscon assassination attack - my description, certainly not his - in A Tragedy in Tucson Brings Out Vitriol on the Left Christian Post 01/11/2011.
He quotes the Rev. Franklin Graham as follows:
To try to place blame before an investigation has occurred is in itself Inciting [sic] hatred. Because we may disagree with a person from another political party, and something bad happens to that person, does that mean that we are responsible for what happens to that person? By no means.One might think that someone who presents himself as a moral and religious leader, as Graham the Younger does, might want to make the distinction that most adults have no trouble making between moral responsibility for creating a toxic environment with hate rhetoric encouraging violence and the legal responsibility for a particular crimes.
But neither Graham the Younger nor Tony Beam bothers with such sissy nonsense. No, they trash them thar libruls instead!
I don't know if Beam was referring to the statement quoted in this Christian Post story, Stephanie Samuel, Franklin Graham Offers Condolences to Victims of Tucson Tragedy 01/10/2011. Other reports of Graham's position include Graham Warns against Blame Game in Ariz. Shooting CBNNews.com 01/11/2011 and David Patten,
Franklin Graham Defends Palin on Arizona Shootings Newsmax 01/11/2011. (Note: Newsmax is a far-right news source and I don't assume the accuracy of any reporting found only there.)
Samuel reports that Graham the Younger offered general sympathy for the victims. And she writes:
Franklin described Loughner as a "deranged man" but said it was "hasty" to conclude that his attack was motivated by politics.I wonder how this squares with his own statement, quoted by Beam but not by Samuel, "To try to place blame before an investigation has occurred is in itself Inciting [sic] hatred." Just how did the Rev. Graham know the accused shooter is "deranged" even "before an investigation has occurred"?
From Samuel's article:
"If something horrific happens to a person, it does not mean those who hold differing views are responsible for the actions of a disturbed individual," he cautioned.Samuel's reporting here is downright misleading. I could see on the face of it when I saw his YouTube video that he was making references to far-right political notions. See for instance, these reports:
Chip Berlet, Alleged Giffords Shooter Shares Currency Plot Obsession with Anti-Abortion Killer 01/08/2011 Talk to Action 01/08/2011; Dave Neiwert, Yes, Jared Loughner was 'crazy'. That doesn't exculpate the milieu that unhinged him C&L 01/09/2011; Mark Potok, Who is Jared Lee Loughner? Hatewatch 01/09/2011
Would it have been too much trouble for a reporter from the Christian Post to call or e-mail Chip Berlet or Dave Neiwert or Mark Potok to ask about this? They are all well-known authorities or the Radical Right.
Still, some have pointed the finger at conservative pundits and rally participants for fostering hate speech in the political spectrum. Others have accused Tea Party leader Sarah Palin who featured a target map which used gun sights to mark Democratic districts.Not having waited for the investigation, why did Franklin the Younger think cop shows on TV or whatever the heck he's talking about had anything to do with the Tucson assassination attack? The accused assassin's YouTube farewell video showed clear evidence of his immersion in kooky far-right political propaganda. It didn't say anything about cop shows on TV teaching him it's all right to kill Democrats.
Beam and Graham reflected pretty much the same circle-the-wagons approach as their supposedly more secular conservative counterparts. So just what was the "Christian" part of Christian conservatives in their response to this shooting in Tuscon?
Tags: christian right, domestic terrorism, terrorism
| +Save/Share | |
Links to this post:
No subject for immortal verse
That we who lived by honest dreams
Defend the bad against the worse."
-- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?
[Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
SEARCH THIS SITE
News & Media Links