Thursday, May 05, 2011
Is the Obama Administration turning to an exit strategy for Afghanistan?I certainly hope so. Bob Dreyfuss reads the signals that way in US Officials: Now It's Time to End the War The Nation Online 05/04/2011: "The Obama administration is sending important signals that the killing of Osama bin Laden means that it’s time to wind down the war and talk to the Taliban."
That would be the sensible and practical thing to do. It's been obvious for a while that our exit from Afghanistan would come when US officials got tired of the endless war. A majority of the public has been tired of it for a while.
Anne-Marie Slaughter, a leading "humanitarian hawk" and a former official in Hillary Clinton's State Department, writes in Escaping from Afghanistan's Mad-Max Present: What Osama bin Laden's death means for South Asia's future Foreign Policy 05/03/2011:
It is about getting from where we are now to where we want to be -- a realistic vision of a secure, stable, and self-reliant Afghanistan. Achieving that goal requires seizing the opportunity and the political space afforded us by Osama Bin Laden's death to orchestrate and schedule negotiations on a final political settlement within Afghanistan and a broader regional economic and security agreement. In the meantime, as the endgame begins, the coalitions must move as rapidly as possible to a posture of supporting only those Afghan forces and officials who demonstrably take responsibility for their own security and development. That was, after all, the central premise of how the United States distributed funds to European countries under the Marshall Plan.I'm skeptical about the actual prospects of a Marshall Plan for Afghanistan, even if Congress would fund it. But if the Obama Administration wants to hold up something like that as a face-saving device that accelerates a military pull-out, I won't be complaining terribly about it.
Slaughter - perhaps an unfortunate last name for a foreign policy specialist - also points to a weak point in US counterinsurgency strategy, the idea of establishing secure zones to win the population to the government side. Doing that with local forces is one thing. Doing it with foreign troops is something very different:
Security has to be the top priority. A secure Afghanistan would be a country with low levels of violence that is defended and policed by its own local, regional, and national forces. Security means not only an end to open conflict between the government and insurgents and/or warlords, but also the kind of everyday safety that allows citizens to go to work and to send their children to school. It means a country free from the continual fear of violence or death, whether targeted or random.I certainly hope the Obama Administration uses this opportunity to push for a rapid exit from the Afghanistan War.
Tags: afghanistan war, anne-marie slaughter
| +Save/Share | |
Links to this post:
No subject for immortal verse
That we who lived by honest dreams
Defend the bad against the worse."
-- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?
[Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
SEARCH THIS SITE
News & Media Links