Sunday, August 20, 2006
Meanwhile, in Cheney's other success-story country...I've been a little surprised that there hasn't been more resistance in the European Union countries to continued participation in the NATO mission in Afghanistan. We're way beyond whether the war in 2001 was necessary and justified. The NATO force that is there can't reasonably to expected to suppress the various insurgent group, local warlords and drug barons that are fighting there.So how long will the publics in those democracies support their soldiers being put in danger in another Lost Cause, courtesy of Tony Blair's good friends Dick Cheney and Shrub Bush? It's not going so great right now: Can NATO Win Against Taliban Insurgents? by Dad Noorani Inter Press Service 08/20/06. Noorani writes: British Lt. Gen. David Richards indicated the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) under NATO command would continue to use the heavy firepower the coalition has employed in recent months in response to an escalation in militant attacks. "We will retain the capability and will to strike ruthlessly at the enemies of Afghanistan when required," he said.I would note in connection with current discussions of the Afghanistan War that Juan Cole and other analysts familiar with Afghanistan caution that what the US press often refers to as resurgent "Taliban" may involve various other groups than just the notorious Taliban that ran the Afghan government. | +Save/Share | | |
FEATURED QUOTE
No subject for immortal verse That we who lived by honest dreams Defend the bad against the worse." -- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?
ABOUT US
RECENT POSTS
ARCHIVES
RECENT COMMENTS
[Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
SEARCH THIS SITE
BLUE'S NEWS
ACT BLUE
BLUE LINKS
Environmental Links Gay/Lesbian Links News & Media Links Organization Links Political Links Religious Links Watchdog Links
BLUE ROLL
MISCELLANEOUS
|