Thursday, November 17, 2005
But, but, didn't all the Democrats agree with Bush about Saddam?Writing before the Dark Lord's latest pronouncment of maldicion on the unbelievers and heretics, Gene Lyons wrote about this silly but poisonous argument that the Democrats shouldn't criticize Bush's preventive war in Iraq because they all believed, well, whatever Bush and Cheney are claiming at the moment their cause for going to war was: Rewriting History Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 11/16/05.In the case of Bush holding up Kerry's words from the time of the war resolution as exoneration for himself, Lyons writes of Kerry: Silly man. Kerry believed, or pretended to believe, like many politically timid Democrats, Bush's deeply cynical assurances.Lyons also addresses Cheney's role in the WMD war fraud: But did the Bush administration spike the punch ? Absolutely, it did.And, of course, there were the forged documents from Niger, which Cheney's former chief of staff Scooter Libby has already been indicted in connection to the coverup of the Iraqi nuclear-weapons scam this administration ran in 2002-3. No, it wasn't Bill Clinton or Howard Dean or Michael Moore who was hyping the nuclear-weapons threat. It certainly wasn't Mohamed ElBaradei and the International Atomic Energy Commission he heads. They were saying that it was unlikely that Iraq had such a program at all. | +Save/Share | | |
FEATURED QUOTE
No subject for immortal verse That we who lived by honest dreams Defend the bad against the worse." -- Cecil Day-Lewis from Where Are The War Poets?
ABOUT US
RECENT POSTS
ARCHIVES
RECENT COMMENTS
[Tip: Point cursor to any comment to see title of post being discussed.]
SEARCH THIS SITE
BLUE'S NEWS
ACT BLUE
BLUE LINKS
Environmental Links Gay/Lesbian Links News & Media Links Organization Links Political Links Religious Links Watchdog Links
BLUE ROLL
MISCELLANEOUS
|